Pando—the Earth’s Most Massive Organism—Is Shrinking
Declining forests and rampant forest fires are symptoms of bad forest management.
In the face of these escalating symptoms, politicians, bureaucrats and agencies offer their catch-all excuses — global “warming” and “invasive species.” To combat the ecological illness, they blame their usual suspects and offer their usual catch-all solutions — apply more chemicals and remove more animals.
Forest managers are failing the resources in their care because they don’t understand that healthy ecological systems require keystone grazers as well as abundant prey and abundant predators. In the absence of bison, cattle are essential provided grazing is planned to mimic nature. Plants evolved under grazing pressure and must be thinned, mowed and stimulated by animals in order to thrive.
Until forestry practices incorporate this insight, forests will decline and forest fires will increase in severity and frequency. And because fires – and chemicals used to fight fires as well as to poison “invasive” plants – harm both forests and rivers, fisheries and wildlife will also continue to decline.
NOTE: this article was originally published to NYTimes.com on October 17, 2018. It was written by JoAnna Klein.
On 106 acres in Fishlake National Forest in Richfield, Utah, a 13-million-pound giant has been looming for thousands of years. But few people have ever heard of him.
This is “the Trembling Giant,” or Pando, from the Latin word for “I spread.” A single clone, and genetically male, he is the most massive organism on Earth. He is a forest of one: a grove of some 47,000 quivering aspen trees — Populus tremuloides — connected by a single root system, and all with the same DNA.
But this majestic behemoth may be more of a Goliath, suggests a study published Wednesday in PLOS ONE. Threatened by herds of hungry animals and human encroachment, Pando is fighting a losing battle.
The study, consisting of recent ground surveys and an analysis of 72 years of aerial photographs, revealed that this unrealized natural treasure and keystone species — with hundreds of dependents — is shrinking. And without more careful management of the forest, and the mule deer and cattle that forage within him, the Trembling Giant will continue to dwindle.
“It’s been thriving for thousands of years, and now it’s coming apart on our watch,” said Paul Rogers, an ecologist at Utah State University who led the study.
How Pando got so big is a mystery. Perhaps it lived among other clones and became dominant over time. Or maybe the relatively flat land where it grows encouraged its spread. Maybe Pando just outcompeted other trees.
Pando isn’t alone: there are other groves of single-clone aspens in North America that dominate their landscape, though none as massive. They reproduce asexually. Instead of growing from seeds, sprouts emerge directly from roots within the tree’s underground web. Each tree is one stem among thousands that belong to a single clone. When damaged, aspens send out hormonal signals saying, “Hey roots, time to make replacements.”
Pando is constantly reproducing, which is essential to its resilience. Lacking genetic diversity, it relies on having trees of different sizes and ages. That way, if one layer or generation dies off, there’s another waiting to replace it.
But Pando’s critical demographics are out of balance. When Dr. Rogers and Darren McAvoy, a forestry colleague at Utah State, surveyed the forest, they found that older trees were dying, as expected, but that, on the whole, young ones weren’t replacing them.
“If this were a community of humans, it would be as if a whole town of 47,000 had only 85-year-olds in it,” Dr. Rogers said. “Where is the next generation?”
Perhaps they are being eaten or trampled.
Inadequate fencing, or the absence of it, seem to leave young patches of forest at the mercy of hungry mule deer, which are seeking refuge from hunters and increasing human activity. Foraging cattle, allowed into the forest in the summer, are another factor in Pando’s shrinkage.
Aerial photos also revealed that Pando’s crown steadily thinned as human activity grew, especially in the last half century, with the addition of campgrounds, cabins and a telephone line, which drew animals that graze on forest leaves and shoots.
“All these human actions have favored these browsers — their numbers, their lack of movement — so that they have a safe haven,” said Dr. Rogers. “And all of this is to the detriment of the survival of this clone.”
But there’s hope for Pando as managers learn from past mistakes and take advantage of an improved understanding of forest ecology.
Where one section of the forest has been properly fenced off and managed, trees have grown tens of feet in just a few years. Pando’s genetics may encourage its fast growth in new areas.
More fencing, culling of deer, and experimentation with the forest’s natural ecology ultimately might save Pando, Dr. Rogers said. And educating the public about the giant’s significance may spur novel conservation methods. For instance, saving common species such as aspen, which support high biodiversity, might be just as important as saving rare, charismatic species.
“If we can save this, there are lessons that may help us save hundreds to thousands of species worldwide,” Dr. Rogers said. “If we can’t manage that 106 acres and restore it, what does that say about our greater interactions with the earth?”
Militant eco-activism hasn’t exactly helped inspire people to embrace nature either. They spend more money on protests, private property destruction and lawsuits for “Sue & Settle” get-rich-quick schemes and yet, very little time, effort and resources are actually restoring natural places which have been ruined. Whatever their cause when starting out, it’s morphed into political ideology and forcing the rest of mankind to accept a twisted, debased worldview. And that’s a shame because nature really is one of the easiest things to embrace when properly presented.
Yes Kevin, a little common sense would go a long way.
Most so-called ‘conservationists’ don’t think about the social or economic consequences of their programs. And so they do things that are socially and economically unsustainable. Add to that their faulty understandings of how nature functions, and you can see why we go on doing damage, in the well-intentioned name of doing good.
But also, much eco-activism – to use your term – is an ideology based on fake science, cynically intended to allow its advocates to take political power for themselves.
Thanks for writing,
People that make the decisions plus politics will eventually ruin our ecosystems. The managers are not properly trained and allowed to make appropriate decisions. My college education as a Biologist taught me the importance of your approach to management. High fence management approach is taking over Texas, most only want to feed and i have seen the quality of these operations degrade. Keep up the good work, I am behind you.
Yes so much of what the agencies and universities are doing and promoting is really bad. Look at Roundup: case-after-case, study-after-study, concludes it causes cancer; meanwhile its use is increasing because they promote it and use it themselves.