Using Cows to Improve Wildlife Habitat and Increase Pronghorn
This is the second in a series about how domestic animals like cattle can help wildlife and habitat in desert grasslands. Our first introduced Cows and Quail, Albuquerque-based Holistic Management International’s range and wildlife program which focused on quail.
Note: Originally published on this blog in 2012. Written by Christopher Gill. Republished on “Throwback Thursday”
Our topic in this article is the most characteristic large mammal of far-West Texas and New Mexico: the pronghorn (Antilocapra americana).
Unlike bison, pronghorn were never found outside the high plains and grasslands of the American West nor ever far from bison. When bison were most plentiful, there may have been 50 million pronghorn! This close association of pronghorn with bison contains the main clue to their conservation and restoration.
“Circle Ranch pronghorn numbers have increased during a period in which far-West Texas has seen an 80% decline. But Circle has been under grazing of some kind since 1880 and under holistic planned grazing since 2000.”
No Cows, No Pronghorn
Far-West Texas pronghorn numbers have declined about 80% in the last 20 years. No “expert” can say why, or what to do. During these same years, cattle, which in many ways are like bison, have been moved off the ranges and into feed lots. Sadly, connecting the dots between these facts seems to have eluded our academic, range and wildlife bureaucracies. The smart and dedicated people working on this problem have been trained not to question the core assumption that removing large grazers from desert ranges is good for habitat and wild animals.
The key insight to understanding and reversing pronghorn decline is this: Pronghorn, as a species, is dependent upon other large grazers. That’s it. As the manager of the 250,000-acre Armendaris Ranch in the Jornado del Muerto observed to our Cows & Quail class, “No cows, no pronghorn.”
When the nomadic herds of bison and other wild animals disappeared, cattle, sheep, goats, burros and horses replaced them. But for decades now, an unprofitable ranching economy and negative institutional advice have combined to remove livestock from our Southwestern desert grasslands. The universally-accepted range theory of the land-grant universities, and government agencies says that land and wildlife must be protected from large numbers of animals.
While it is true that conventional grazing has damaged our Western ranges, the disappearance of large grazers and of diverse animal communities creates another phenomenon called “over-rest.” This is as deadly as over-grazing: For a long time now most range damage has come from over-rest, not from over-grazing. Ask the next person who tells you total rest restores desert grasslands how his own lawn would look if it went 30-years without mowing or fertilizer!
While pronghorn are physiologically complex, their “must-have” list is short. Like the canary in the coal mine, pronghorn is a “bellwether” species which disappears first when ranges decline. Pronghorn need healthy habitat that contains free water, the ability to move across large areas to food, lots of forbs to eat, tall grass and plants in which to hide fawns, and generally-open country where they can see their enemies coming from a distance and be able to flee. Let’s look at these critical needs.
As there is no artificial feed that pronghorn will readily take, they are dependant on naturally-occurring forbs (“weeds”): To find these, pronghorn must move across large areas to where these grow after often distant and spotty desert rains. Pronghorn will show up 2 days after a rainstorm, having moved many miles: How do they know to do this? Many ranchers think that weeds are useless to their cattle. In fact, cattle get about 30% of their diet as forbs. So a healthy weed community, something that over long-term depends on soil disturbance from large animals and their fertilizing dung and urine, is good for both domestics and pronghorn. Brush and “weed” poisons like Roundup (glyphosate) and Spike (tebuthiuron) kill weeds for many years: use with extreme caution if at all!
Sheep net or other low-to-the-ground fences are problems because pronghorn will not jump fences. These are widely-blamed by experts for pronghorn decline. At Circle Ranch we modify as many of these as we can afford in any year by lifting the bottom to be 18″ above the ground. But, long after net fencing came to our ranges, we still had large pronghorn numbers. Sheep and goat ranching, the reason for these fences, disappeared 35 years ago. During this same period of pronghorn decline many old fences have been falling down. The disappearance of the sheep and goats once concentrated within has harmed pronghorn more than the old fences themselves because we have lost the animal impact that kept plants healthy. Modify your fences so that pronghorn can scoot under them. This allows them to flee predators and travel to food.
Another “problem” for pronghorn is predation. 80% of pronghorn fawns die within 60 days, and 80% of these are taken by coyotes. Pronghorn fawns need covering grass where they can be hidden by their mothers. Unlike other big animals, pronghorn will not stand and defend their young. The reason pronghorn can outrun any predator is that they evolved with meaner, more numerous and faster predators than those that are left. So they evolved to usually drop twins and to run away, and to herd with bison which will attack predators
Mr. Coyote, however, is an effective little “wolf” who, with no predators of his own anymore has become more numerous. Coyotes are particularly effective against baby pronghorn. So we have to have dense plant cover if pronghorn babies are to survive. Destocking the ranges causes weeds and grass to die, causing bare ground and brush invasion. Brush hides predators. Allies are missing; smaller numbers are more vulnerable. With respect to the “obvious” solution of helping pronghorn by eradicating coyotes remember this: The history of wildlife management proves predator eradication eventually backfires and harms the animals we wish to “protect.” Nature has worked this out better than any wildlife “manager.”
Pronghorn need grass cover, weeds, open country, and a ‘big brother’, not predator eradications. Cattle will help with each, provided we plan grazing to leave high residual forage. This is a win-win: Planned graziers have discovered that cattle performance improves if just the upper third of the growth is grazed. High residual grass conserves soil moisture. Plants recover faster, providing food and cover for wildlife and allowing earlier re-grazing.
Drought is another factor. Many experts are blaming pronghorn decline on weather. But the long-term decline in range conditions across the West has continued through several wet and dry cycles. Some experts say that climate change is the culprit even though the climate has not changed (yet). All our droughts are more intense because rainfall has become inefficient as plant cover has been replaced by bare ground. Most far-West Texas rain runs off or evaporates immediately. Planned graziers understand this because we study ecosystem processes, especially the water cycle, including plant spacing, soil crusting, and whether or not there is turf and root mass to catch rain like a sponge.
Since pronghorn need free water, the water that we provide cattle helps them, but note: Common cattle practices such as cutting water off in order to move cattle will harm your pronghorn and quail.
Another problem for pronghorn is worms. With the loss of animal impact on the ranges, we lose the forbs that are found in these plant communities. Pronghorn have a big liver that allows them to digest toxic weeds. What would poison other animals including worms nourishes a pronghorn. To the extent pronghorn decline is caused by parasites, we are likely seeing some disruption of nature’s worm medicine associated with habitat decline. Some now-missing plant or organism used to suppress worms. Parasite infestations are symptoms, not root causes. Animal impact will work better than worm poisons to deal with this, and it will avoid the unintended consequences that come with chemicals and poisons.
Another reason given by the experts for pronghorn decline is habitat fragmentation: The subdivision of huge areas into smaller areas. And yet, we have huge areas of unfragmented habitat across Texas from which pronghorn have completely disappeared. Examples would be the Wildlife Management Areas, state and federal parks, the International Biosphere Reserves, and many vast ranches. All have in large measure been destocked. Large domestic grazers like cows are one (but not the only) common-sense substitute for the missing bison.
In summary, habitat decline and missing protection of large grazers is the root cause of pronghorn decline: not hunting, coyotes, competition from ‘exotics’ including cattle, fences, worms or weather. Pronghorn decline is a symptom of rangeland decline –especially loss of perennial forbs. Animal impact under attentive planning and management is the only effective medicine. Collaborative grazing efforts between neighbors are also critical. These are blocked by prejudice to ‘exotics’, and not just cows.
And this brings us to Cows and Quail. We are teaching ranchers, wildlifers and agency personnel what planned graziers have proven worldwide: That domestic animals can bring the plant community to greater health. But here we must pose a major caveat: Unless this tool of planned grazing is applied with an understanding of the needs of all these species, it can harm wildlife. Fortunately, it turns out that the needs of pronghorn, quail and wildlife converge with the needs of cattle. Planned grazing works for all animals provided that we consider the physiology of plants and animals, are attentive managers, and continuously monitor results.
To find a Cows and Quail workshop near you, CLICK HERE
Chris Gill and his family own the Circle Ranch near Van Horn, Texas where they are using cattle and other ‘exotics’ to improve wildlife habitat.